Wednesday, October 16, 2013

Misery in Marriage

Today in class, a certain question was raised about a certain someone being happy in her marriage to Mr. Collins. I intend to answer the question with the utmost clarity and decisiveness.

I’m going to make this perfectly clear: the word “happiness” does not apply in any way, shape, or form, at any point in time, to Charlotte after she marries Mr. Collins. In fact, a better word to describe the Collins’ marriage would fall more under the scope of absolute misery.

Let’s begin with the object of Charlotte’s eternal misery, Mr. Collins. From the very outset of the engagement (not the marriage, the engagement), Charlotte demonstrates that she clearly understands the horrific entity that is Mr. Collins. In a rather colorful demonstration of indirect characterization on Austen’s part, Charlotte describes Collins as “neither sensible nor agreeable, his society was irksome, and his attachment to her must be imaginary” (Austen 83). As almost all negative commentary on Collins’s personality comes from indirect characterization, everyone but Collins knows that he’s basically the single person that no one wants to be around (with the exception of Lady Catherine). Charlotte’s certainly not a fan, and she knows that part of Collins’s interest in her is due to the fact that he wants to get back at Lizzy. Charlotte doesn’t even care. All she wants is to be secure in life, happiness was never part of the equation. She willingly sacrifices her happiness to be a part of Collins’s game with Lizzy.

With the event of her marriage, Charlotte’s potential happiness takes a downward turn, as Elizabeth observes during her visit to Rosings Park. When Collins talks about working in his garden, “Charlotte talked of the healthfulness of the exercise, and owned she encouraged it as much as possible” (104). So, basically, Charlotte does everything she can to kick Collins out of the house so she can have time to herself. She desperately needs an escape. Charlotte and Collins have been married less than six months at this point in the novel, and already Charlotte does everything she can to escape the union (barring actual divorce. This is the late 18th century, divorce is still a no-no, and only possible under certain very explicit situations. See this link if you wish to learn more). Though she thought she was prepared for a loveless marriage, one that might potentially grow love in the future, Charlotte clearly underestimated the supreme awfulness of the situation at hand. Society never taught her how to handle something of this nature, so she runs away from it.

Moreover, she has to deal with Lady Catherine, arguably one of the most intolerable women of any fictional era, and, coincidentally, a historical allusion to Catherine the Great of Russia. Catherine the Great, though very powerful and well-known, was not often well-liked. In fact, she had a small circle of people who liked her very much, and a large conglomeration of people who didn’t like her at all. Lady Catherine de Bourgh intentionally mirrors her historical predecessor to the very last, to emphasize the utter misery in which Charlotte must spend the rest of her life. One night when playing cards after dinner, “Lady Catherine was generally speaking – stating the mistakes of the three others or relating some anecdote of herself” (111). This represents Lady Catherine de Bourgh’s general action and attitude. She’s self-important and haughty, and the only person who likes her is Collins (that’s her “small circle” which parallels that of Catherine the Great). Pretty much everyone else can’t stand her, but they’re nice to her because she has money. Charlotte has to deal with this woman at least once weekly, sometimes more if Lady Catherine is feeling condescending and ambivalent enough. That alone in and of itself would be enough to make any person with half a rational brain – which Charlotte most certainly has – miserable for all of eternity. Out of propriety, society requires Charlotte to interact with the woman and seem as if she likes Lady Catherine, but, in reality, the woman is completely intolerable.


In conclusion, security and happiness are very different concepts. While Charlotte has the money and stability she wanted, she doesn’t have anything to facilitate a feeling of happiness or felicity. Her husband, from the very beginning, isn’t described as an agreeable person. Charlotte has to actively work to get almost-happy time to herself, and is constantly confronted with a nasty woman who adamantly feels the need to criticize everything everyone else round her does and says. These are not the elements of a happy marriage, or even a happy life situation. Charlotte is secure, not happy. These are two completely different ideas, of which only one can apply to the new Mrs. Collins. 

2 comments:

  1. Very interesting ideas here Jordy, and I agree with many of them. Yes, Charlotte is a pretty unhappy woman, maybe to the point of misery. And yes, Lady Catherine does really suck. The most intolerable woman character in all of literature? Eh, not sure about that one. Daisy Buchanan is hated by many. And if you want intolerable female characters, try _Beloved_ by Toni Morrison. Or the mothers of Hamlet or Oedipus Rex. Lady Catherine is intolerable yes, but many females rival and trump her in irritability. But back to the main point; the marriage of Charlotte to Collins. You make a lot of really good point and use great references back to the novel. But there is one flaw in your thinking. We have to remember that Charlotte chose to do this. She chose financial security, even though she knew that Collins was going to be a miserable marriage partner. Personally, I do think that Charlotte is miserable, you can get that general feeling from the way that she speaks after the marriage. But this is all her fault. We talk so much about feminism and marrying for love, but maybe Charlotte isn't like the proto-feminists around her. She chose this misery. This is her fault, but she will never have to worry about money in her life and that choice was more important to her than true love. Yes, Charlotte is secure and not happy, but it is her fault. Great ideas, and great writing on your part.
    -Nick

    ReplyDelete
  2. I really enjoyed reading your post here. I actually wrote my blog for this week on a very similar topic. I see that you are of the opinion that Charlotte can never and will never be happy in her marriage, and I can easily see why it would be argued to be the case. Certainly anyone that would have to be married to Mr. Collins and that had to regularly deal with the insufferable nature of Lady Catherine would regularly be pushed to the limits in terms of patience and civility. However, I wonder that even if Charlotte is displeased with the situation that she finds herself in, is it possible that she is still happy to a degree? This happiness would not be on the same level as the happiness that Jane or Elizabeth express in their marriages, of course, but it may be present in the form contentedness with the situation. At the very least, Charlotte seems to be very grateful for the fact that there was someone that she was able to marry and that the financial and living situation that she found herself in following her betrothal was stable. You describe this as her being secure, but I ask, doesn't security bring with it a small degree of happiness simply in the way that it banishes worry from a person? Either way, I thoroughly enjoyed reading your post, and I look forward to reading more from you in the future. -Peter R.

    ReplyDelete