Thus far into A Brave
New World, major themes are as yet still building, and for the most part
the key to the novel has remained elusive. However, the novel seems to be
highly interested in the negativity of individuality and personal identity. Social
continuity and homogeneity maintain themselves as society’s stability, and
individuality threatens the entity which is this World State.
The first instance which begins to explore the instrumentality
of stripping society of individuality comes in the very beginning of the novel,
when the students tour the Central London Hatchery and Conditioning Centre. The
new process for fertilizing eggs and then making embryos results in, for all
castes other than Alphas and Betas, results in “Making ninety-six human beings
grow where only one grew before. Progress” (Huxley 17). Syntactically, these
statements represent much of the philosophy of the society. It (the society)
does not need to be made up of “complete” individuals, ones with independent
mindsets, goals, and outlooks on life. Like these near-sentences, the people of
the society can carry out their function without having a full consciousness. This
encourages the retraction of individuality, and substitution with hive-minded
people, for the sake of a more efficient system. Much like the way Huxley uses
only fragments to describe the lack of genetic individuality within the World
State, the geneticists and breeders strip the people down to only the necessary
elements for their castes. Intelligence, psychological preferences and
predispositions, and social mindset are precisely engineered to ensure the
human contains only what is exactly necessary to give meaning to the situation,
but not enough for any extraneous meanings or opinions to form from the
information planted in that person.
Because the society actively puts down individuality, any
appearance of difference is heavily ridiculed. Even the individual who appears
or thinks differently than the rest of the society notices the difference, and
extreme self-consciousness of the difference results. Bernard Marx, while
intellectually equal to anyone else of the Alpha-Plus caste, is slightly
shorter than the rest of his caste, and as such feels out of place. Because of
this difference, “feeling an outsider he behaved like one,” directly characterizing
Marx as someone in direct conflict with the goal of the World State society
(69). In the case of the type of characterization Huxley employs to expose
Marx, the use of direct as opposed to indirect characterization supersedes the
importance of the explicit word choice of the statement. Though the others of
his caste and his general society have an awareness of the difference between
Marx and others conditionately equal to him, Marx has the greatest awareness of this difference. Marx internalizes his
difference from others, and even works to make it larger. He consciously
separates himself from the rigorous hypnopædia propaganda he was exposed to as
a child. He wants to get to know the women he sees, as opposed to having lots
of one night stands. His interests directly conflict with the society, and when
people see this, they look down on him, more so than they do simply because of
his physical “defect,” as it were. Any form of individuality maintains itself
as alien to this society.
Furthermore, this individuality greatly threatens the
society as a whole, whether Marx knows it or not. The society as a whole cannot
function properly if a member becomes different enough to challenge the norms,
although, as the Director states, “the social body persists although the
component cells may change” (95). Marx’s mentality and challenging of the norms
and hypnopædia represents something far more dangerous than simply a component
cell dying and being exchanged in the metaphorical body of the World State.
Newness of thought, innovation of opinion and tradition have the potential to
spread like a cancer through this society, destroying it from the inside.
Truly, the most dangerous occurrence for this society lies in the possibility
that hypnopædia could be overcome, and the past freedom of thought come back.
Especially dangerous, because the only people physically capable of this kind
of thought are in the upper castes, and as a result, the differences in thought
would manifest in the most important parts of the proverbial body, the
reproductive system, the brain, the vital organs. A cancer of the support
system of the body, the lower castes that keep the infrastructure going, a bone
or skin cancer that is slow growing and not quick to metastasize, that can be
cut out, cut off, and the body can keep going. But, when a cell in the brain,
in the heart, in the major systems of the body becomes cancerous and begins to
spread and grow, to overtake the mother organ and then move to others, it takes
down the whole body, cannot be removed because as surely as the cancer will
kill the body, so would the surgery necessary to remove it. This cancer is
fatal. Huxley points out that even when highly conditioned, individuality, social
cancerousness exists; to a society completely reliant on uniformity and the
stripping of individual identity, the danger this cancer poses is real, and
could spread to Stage IV before the body even realizes it’s there. (859 words)
No comments:
Post a Comment